Observe: The presentation is done on an all white background. The font is basic and not too risky. The prezi consists of mostly quotes. The use of image is minimal, only being one. It would be nice to have more pictures or video to help prove the point. There were some grammar mistakes and misspellings. Also, some of the quotes used were very long and wordy. The group did a good job of explaining most of the points thoroughly.
Infer: The chapter looks at writing and how it is authoritative. Ancient texts were very strong because of their "visual simplicity" and normalcy to them. Websites introduce a whole new meaning to authority and changeability. No matter the form of text, the reader decides and deciphers meaning. No matter the method of writing, reader and writer must meet on common ground.
Question: Is there a reason you did not use many images or video?
Does a printed work carry more authority with it then digital text?
What determines what is authoritative and what isn't?
Can there be websites that are authoritative?
Is it necessary for people to read printed work, or does the change to digital writing suit all needs?
Why is the reader so important?
No comments:
Post a Comment